August 04, 2006
Advertising
Online Escorts – Analyzing the Legal Issues
By: Lawrence G. Walters
www.FirstAmendment.com
Online escort directories have proliferated in recent
times. Although many of the legal issues pertaining to operation of an adult
website are equally applicable to online escort venues, such as §2257
compliance, copyright, etc., a host of unique legal concerns are generated by
this particular business model. Since some escorts have occasionally been
known to “cross the line” and engage in sexual activity, an operator of an
online escort directory must be familiar with the laws relating to
prostitution, solicitation and assignation, along with the constitutional
protections afforded to commercial speech under the First Amendment. This
article will briefly analyze some of the interesting and occasionally complex
legal issues for the aspiring online escort agency webmaster.
LAW ENFORCEMENT CLIMATE
Escort agencies are favorite targets of vice units across
the country. Regular raids and sting operations occur in cities across the
United States, with cops posing as customers intent on testing the boundaries
that various escorts may or may not be willing to cross during their hour long
companionship interludes. By flashing enough cold, hard cash, law enforcement
officers often successfully tempt escorts into engaging in, or agreeing to
engage in, some form of sexual activity in exchange for money.
With the notable exception of regulated brothels in certain
portions of Nevada, states outlaw prostitution in its various forms. While the
exchange of sexual activity for money is commonly at the root of such
prohibitions, various other tangential activities fall within the ambit of
modern prostitution laws, including agreements to engage in prostitution,
encouraging another to engage in prostitution, arranging appointments for the
purpose of prostitution, living off the proceeds of prostitution, operating a
facility of business for the purpose of facilitating prostitution, and/or
owning a structure used for prostitution activities[1]. The seriousness of
these offenses depends on the particular states’ laws involved, but can
range from a simple misdemeanor, commonly resulting in a small fine, to
racketeering offenses, carrying substantial penalties including decades of
incarceration, a six-figure fine and forfeiture of all business assets.
Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the risks involved in helping to
arrange meetings between individuals that create an environment fostering
sexual activity is critical, given the potentially serious consequences
involved.
Law enforcement agencies long ago realized the futility of
trying to combat the prostitution problem by routinely arresting individual
prostitutes and sending them through the revolving door of arrest, plea, fine
and release (although the practice continues). Therefore, vice officers have
tried various other strategies designed to combat the problem at different
levels, such as arresting customers, publishing their names in the newspaper,
educating prostitutes regarding the risks involved, forfeiting vehicles used
during encounters, and focusing on punishing “pimps.” But even those
methods have not been particularly successful in combating the world’s
oldest profession.
More recently, law enforcement has attacked the problem
from a different angle, by focusing on the advertisers of common fronts for
prostitution, i.e., escort agencies, massage parlors and body scrub salons. In
some areas, even the phone book publishers have been threatened with
racketeering offenses if they continued to run yellow page advertisements for
escort agencies, resulting in the prompt disappearance of this category from
various cities’ yellow page listings. The theory is that the prostitution
business will dry up if the escorts are forced underground making them hard to
find. While this is certainly not a cure-all solution, it has put a damper on
the escort business in various cities throughout the United States where such
tactics have been used . . . that is, until the Internet came along.
The Internet created an alternative venue for advertising
underground or “gray market” products and services. This instantaneous
world-wide advertising venue has become quite popular for escorts and
customers alike, allowing the advanced scheduling of sensual liaisons with
virtual anonymity, in sharp contrast to the expense and risks involved with
long distance telephone calls.
This retreat to the Internet has not gone entirely
unnoticed by law enforcement, including in the State of Florida, where a
popular escort service information site, www.BigDoggie.net,
was the subject of a criminal prosecution by a joint effort between the
Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office and the Metropolitan Bureau of
Investigation in Tampa and Orlando, respectively. Although police tried to
shut down the website under some creative theories, it remains active as an
online venue for the exchange of information about escort services in this
state. The prosecution against www.BigDoggie.net will certainly not be the
last of its kind, as vice units across the country realize that the Internet
has now supplanted the yellow pages as the primary source of information for
adult-oriented entertainment, including escort services.
Notably, many escort services run perfectly law-abiding and
legitimate operations, and zealously protect their adult license by strict
enforcement of a “no sexual contact” policy. However, law enforcement
still views such businesses with a jaundiced eye, and will continue to focus
on investigating such establishments for violation of prostitution-related
offenses.
COMMERCIAL SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Did you ever wonder how High Times® magazine can
get away with talking about the cultivation and use of illegal drugs without
running afoul of the law? The answer is found in the First Amendment. Under
Free Speech principles, citizens have the right to discuss, and write about,
activities which may themselves be illegal. In other words, the government’s
ability to regulate conduct is not coextensive with its ability to regulate
speech relating to such conduct[2]. In the context of advertising activities
that might be illegal, the United States Supreme Court has held that the First
Amendment protects commercial speech about a product or service that is within
the government’s power to otherwise completely ban, such as gambling
activities[3]. Thus, while gambling may itself be illegal, advertising that
activity cannot be completely banned.
In the specific case of advertising online escort agencies, the First
Amendment plays a significant role.
Theoretically, the advertisers are all licensed
escorts, agencies or businesses, conducting presumably legitimate escort
activities. Therefore, under the appropriate test[4] for determining the
validity of any potential regulation of commercial speech, the government
would have difficulty completely banning truthful advertising relating to such
activities. There is some precedent for criminalizing other communicative
activities such as solicitation of murder, extortion or assignation of
prostitution, for that matter. However, the typical online escort directory
involves a simple sale of advertising space and not actual involvement in
arranging the meetings between customer and service provider. The traditional
advertising relationship enjoys commercial speech protection, generally. While
the government is currently flirting with the argument that advertising
alleged illegal activity, such as online gambling, constitutes “aiding and
abetting” illegal activity; there is little, if any, support found in legal
precedent for the argument that advertising itself can be sufficient to impose
criminal liability.
THE LEGAL ISSUES
By way of summary, the following legal issues are some of the more important
that should be addressed and evaluated in connection with the creation of an
escort directory website:
1. Escort Age Verification – It is important to confirm that all models
depicted on the website, especially those depicted in a sexually-oriented
manner or nude, were over the age of eighteen when the images were created,
and have executed proper age verification records as required by Title 18,
U.S.C. § 2257.
2. Copyright/Publicity Issues – A method must be implemented allowing the
online escort directory to obtain a release of the intellectual property and
publicity rights necessary to post images and/or text relating to the
individual escorts and/or agencies. These details are often ignored, and can
result in significant liability if images are used without supporting rights
transfers.
3. User Age Verification – As with any adult-oriented content, some method
of age verification must be implemented to confirm that users or members of
this website are over the age of eighteen. Escort customers must also be
adults under most local adult entertainment codes, and thus the issue of
facilitating a meeting between an adult escort and a minor may arise in the
absence of valid user age verification, such as that described on
www.BirthDateVerifier.com.
4. User Terms & Conditions – All disclaimer, warranties and customer
service terms should be included in a custom drafted set of Terms &
Conditions for an online escort directory.
5. Privacy Policy – Any Website that collects private information from its
users should have a written Privacy Policy detailing how such information is
used by the website. If certain financial information is collected, this is
required.
6. DMCA Compliance – Since the website will presumably be using content
provided by others, some form of Notice & Takedown Procedure and/or
Designation of Agent to Receive Notices of Claimed Infringement should be
considered. One copyright infringement claim can destroy a small business.
7. Spam Policy – In light of the recently-enacted CAN-SPAM Act, it is
essential to implement some sort of strict policy relating to the use of
unsolicited email to promote the escort directory.
8. Copyright Registration – Once the directory is created, its graphics,
images and text should be registered with the United States Copyright Office,
to help protect copyrights to the fullest extent. Timing is important on this
issue.
9. Avoiding criminal exposure – This is certainly the most complex area to
address, and involves a variety of factors, such as proper use of disclaimers,
image content restrictions, escort descriptions, linking policy, the terms of
the Advertising Agreement, and the overall look and feel of the site. The
Advertising Agreement will likely require any escort agencies to have in place
a set of rules and regulations governing escort conduct to prohibit any
illegal activity.
As always, the devil is in the details, and it is therefore
critical to obtain a competent attorney’s review of the entire website,
along with the Advertising Agreement between the directory website and the
escorts and/or agencies. Some financial relationships are more dangerous than
others, from a liability standpoint. A healthy set of User Terms &
Conditions can also help limit legal liability in connection with these
business models.
CONCLUSION
The growing popularity of online escort directories has not gone unnoticed by
law enforcement officers, who have successfully intimidated other traditional
escort advertisers out of the business. However, by implementing some simple
protective measures, and paying attention to the legal details, potential
exposure can be minimized. As with all areas of developing Internet law, legal
precedent is far from being set. By taking a few common sense precautions,
risks can be reduced to a more acceptable level.
Lawrence G. Walters, Esq., is a partner in the national law
firm of Weston Garrou & DeWitt, with offices in Orlando, Los Angeles, and
San Diego. Mr. Walters represents clients involved in all aspects of adult
media. Nothing in this article constitutes legal advice. Please contact your
personal attorney with specific legal questions. Mr. Walters can be reached at
Larry@LawrenceWalters.com, through his website: www.FirstAmendment.com or via
AOL Screen Name: “Webattorney.”
[1] E.g. Ch. 796, Fla. Stat. (2003).
[2] Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Association, Inc. v. U.S, 527 U.S. 173,
119 S.Ct 1923, 144 L.Ed.2d 161 (1999).
[3] Id.
[4] The courts used what is commonly referred to as the Central Hudson Test in
determining whether governmental regulation of speech is valid. This Test
involves an initial determination whether the product or service being
advertised is legal, and if so, whether there is a significant governmental
interest in regulating the activity, and finally a consideration of the
“fit” between the goals sought to be achieved, and the methods used to
accomplish those goals in the challenged regulation. Hudson Gas & Electric
Corp v. Public Service Commission of New York, 447 U.S. 557, 100 S.Ct. 2343,
65 L.Ed.2d 341 (1980).
Lawrence
G. Walters, Esquire is a partner with the law firm of Weston, Garrou &
DeWitt, based in Los Angeles. Mr. Walters runs the firm's Florida office, and
represents clients involved in all aspects of adult media. Weston, Garrou
& DeWitt handles First Amendment cases nationwide, and has been involved
in significant Free Speech litigation before the United States Supreme Court.
All statements made in the above article are matters of opinion only, and
should not be considered legal advice. Please consult your own attorney on
specific legal matters. You can reach Lawrence Walters at Larry@LawrenceWalters.com
or www.FirstAmendment.com.
Original Link: http://www.firstamendment.com/online_escorts.php