National and International      back
Latest     Archives


Alleged prostitute solicitor may not be cited

By Robyn Moormeister, robynm@theunion.com
January 19, 2007

While sheriff's investigators extend their search for prostitutes who allegedly assaulted a Lake of the Pines man during a botched business deal, it is unlikely the man who solicited the illegal activity will be cited.

"We have to find the prostitutes first to confirm there was a transaction," said Nevada County Sheriff's Det. Dan Saunders, "but if we do, I would seriously doubt they would incriminate themselves."

Nevada County Sheriff Keith Royal said investigators need corroboration or other evidence a crime occurred -other than a confession - to make an arrest for any crime.

"If someone came to us and said 'I just killed 25 people,' we have to make sure it happened," Saunders said. "You can't just go by someone's word."

During his years working undercover prostitution stings in Sacramento, he said, investigators could not arrest a solicitor until two things happened: a conversation about the transaction, then an "overt action," such as money changing hands.

The woman who allegedly wielded the billy club during Saturday's incident, Royal said, has a history of prostitution in Los Angeles and Stockton. His investigators are looking for her with the aid of Sacramento Police detectives and if she is found she will be arrested for assault with a deadly weapon.

The LOP man called the Sheriff's office Saturday evening to report he was maced and beaten by prostitutes.

He had located one of the women's ads for "erotic services" on Craigslist.com and called her, the man told The Union Thursday.

"I called the woman to come to my house, and she came with a driver," he said. "Things didn't go well, and I told her I'd pay for gas money and she refused. She pulled out a can of mace." (It is the Union's policy not to name a crime suspect unless the person is arrested, cited or charged).

The man had already paid the woman $270, Royal said, and he refused to wear a condom at the prostitute's request, so she was leaving with his money.

The man said the prostitute sprayed him, and he chased her into his backyard. As she was climbing over his fence, he said, the other woman got out of her Chevrolet Tahoe, maced him and beat him with the club as he tried to "dodge and weave."

"It was bigger than a police billy club," he said. "It stung me. I got knocked over and rolled into the bushes. It still hurts."

He said he didn't think that he might implicate himself in a crime if he called the police.

"I was beat up and robbed," he said. "That's all I was thinking."

He said he regrets making the call now that the incident has been publicized, though he expressed no remorse for calling a prostitute.

"My wife left me two years ago," he said. "I live out there where it's isolated, and I like sex."

The man should be exposed for endangering others by insisting on unprotected sex with a prostitute, said Susan Wallace, an attorney and victim of an assault and attempted murder at her Nevada City home in 2005.

"To insist on not wearing a condom is so stupid and dangerous," Wallace said Thursday, saying the man could have spread HIV. "There ought to be some accountability."

The man didn't commit "the crime of the century," she said, but she believes police are not being aggressive enough in their investigation.

"If someone were interested, there would be a way of locating independent corroboration," she said.

But Royal said all investigators have against the man is his confession, and that is most likely all they will ever have.


To contact Staff Writer Robyn Moormeister, e-mail robynm@theunion.com or call 477-4236.


Original link: http://www.theunion.com/article/20070119/NEWS/101190169

 

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding and knowledge of legal, political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. in regards to sex workers.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

 
 

       welcome     about us     calendar     news     legal page     resources     get involved!     links