National and International      back
Latest     Archives
Editorial: Legalize prostitution for sake of women
BALTIMORE - No one would tell a daughter to aspire to be a prostitute.

It’s a horrible profession, demeaning and often dangerous.

Some women’s studies theorists say prostitution — like pornography — liberates women from traditional gender roles and gives them power over their sexuality. That’s nonsense, of course. But so is locking women up — and it’s mainly women who go to jail — for the crime.

Brandy Britton, the former University of Maryland, Baltimore County assistant professor charged with prostitution is one of the most recent examples of why its a waste of taxpayer dollars to pursue practitioners of the oldest profession.

The 43-year-old is accused of trading sex for money out of her Ellicott City home. When police raided it in January, they confiscated 150 condoms and bottles of lubricating lotion and records that tied her to a Web site that officials said solicited prostitution. She went to trial earlier this week in Howard County Circuit Court to face four charges of prostitution.

If police think locking her up will be a deterrent to others, they ought to think again. Typing in “escort Baltimore” into the Google search engine retrieves 598,000 responses.

There is neither the money nor the manpower to track down all the local sex workers. Last year, police officers across the state arrested more people for prostitution (1,898) than for forcible rape (418) and other sex offenses (1,312) combined. We wonder how many of the same people will be rearrested this year?

Perhaps a better use of police resources would be to shame those who solicit their services. Shame has helped to find those who do not pay child support, so why couldn’t it help to stop men from frequenting prostitutes? Why not post the names and photos of those arrested and charged with prostitution online and print their names in the local newspapers?

If history can serve as a guide, shame will not stop the profession. Because of that, the better solution would be to legalize prostitution as in parts of Nevada and the Netherlands — and tax the proceeds like any other business. That way the government could use the money to pay for programs to help women find a path out of it.

Consequences of legislative folly

Maryland legislators have shown they think they can strongarm business without consequences. The decision by FPL Group Inc. and Constellation Energy Group Inc. not to merge proves them wrong — again.

“As we considered the situation in Maryland, we determined the risks and uncertainties were too significant to overcome,” said Mayo Shattuck III, Constellation’s chief executive officer.

The decision means consumers could lose $214 million in rate reductions promised by Constellation as part of a plan to win approval for the merger from the state.

That does not count the $386 million in rate cuts — part of June legislation that set electricity rates lower than they would have been had they reflected market prices — that could be subject to legal challenge. The June legislation followed a 1999 law to cap electricity prices for six years at pre-1993 levels.

In an attempt to prove themselves consumer watchdogs, state legislators once again showed themselves incompetent at judging the market — and helping their constituents lower their electricity rates.

The dissolution of the merger must serve as a reminder to them about what happens when they dictate to businesses how to run their operations. Who knows if the “risks and uncertainties” might also make Constellation rethink its commitment to staying in Maryland?

One would think the legislative majority could entertain themselves sufficiently with bungling state operations that they wouldn’t have time to demonstrate their lack of depth in business analysis.

Original link: http://www.examiner.com/a-363221~Editorial__Legalize_prostitution_for_sake_of_women.html

 

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding and knowledge of legal, political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. in regards to sex workers.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

 
 

       welcome     about us     calendar     news     legal page     resources     get involved!     links